Get News Updates RSS RSS Feed
Get News Updates
Real Estate
Automotive
Employment
Services
Classifieds
Market Place
Media Kit
Forms
News
HOME
Front Page
Bulletin Board
Editorials
Obituaries
Sports
GMN Photo Page
Online Obituary Submission
Featured Special Section
Middlesex County South
Health & FItness Guide
About Us
Archive
Contact us
Services
Advertiser Index
Copyright©
2000 - 2009
GMN
All Rights Reserved
Terms of Use
Editorials February 12, 2004
Search Archives


Proposal misses mark


With all the talk of solving New Jersey’s school tax woes in recent years, it’s sad to see that the only real action being taken at the state level has little to do with the actual problems.

Gov. James E. McGreevey, like many state representatives, says he supports a bipartisan effort to look at reforming our system of funding schools, but after all these years, there seems to be no real movement by our state officials to bring about change. Instead, the governor is pushing a five-step plan that steps around the real issues.

Sure, we can get behind the governor’s call for more shared services, and we can’t argue with a plan to make developers help pay for the financial impact they bring to a community. But for most residents, these steps won’t do much with regard to the skyrocketing school tax bills we have been dealing with since the state froze its aid to school districts three years ago.

The governor’s first step, to eliminate the state’s 23 school district "bureaucracies" that have no schools, could do more harm than good, at least in the one Middlesex County town that fits that category, Helmetta. Officials there fear that the savings it would bring, while virtually unnoticeable in the first place, would be at the cost of a system of checks and balances Helmetta now enjoys.

While school tax bills in many area communities have climbed by hundreds of dollars annually in recent years, it’s a shame to see the state focus on the pocket change that may or may not be saved from proposals like this. The state would be better advised to look at each district individually in terms of whether it is an unnecessary bureaucracy or if it makes sense to leave it alone.

As one local school official put it this week, "If that’s the governor’s solution to managing property taxes, we are all in trouble." Perhaps, he said, the state could instead do something about the costs of employees’ health care, which continues to drive up school budgets at a time when flat state aid means taxpayers must foot these costs on their own.

It’s high time that our state officials engaged in real discussions that will address these issues and give New Jersey a better way of funding its schools.