Suburban

Streaming Radio

Real Estate
Mortgage
Automotive
Employment
Services
Classifieds
Market Place
Media Kit
News
HOME
Front Page
Bulletin Board
Letters
Editorials
Obituaries
Schools
Sports
GMN Photo Page
Online Obituary Submission
Featured Special Section
Middlesex County South
Health & FItness Guide
About Us
Archive
Contact us
Services
Advertiser Index
Greg Bean's Podcasts
News Archive

Copyright©
2000 - 2008
GMN
All Rights Reserved
Terms of Use

RSS
RSS Feed


Newspaper web site content management software and services


DMCA Notices
Front PageMay 3, 2007 


Cty. makes Tamarack Hollow purchase official

EAST BRUNSWICK - Middlesex County officials have taken the necessary actions to preserve the 232 acres that were previously proposed for the Tamarack Hollow housing development.

The county Board of Chosen Freeholders entered into a contract April 19 to purchase the land for the county's open space program. Developer Matzel & Mumford had approval to build 57 single-family homes and a sewage treatment facility on the land, which consists of four separate parcels in the area of Fresh Ponds Road and Church Lane.

"This is a significant purchase for our open space preservation program and I'm very excited to make this announcement," Freeholder Director David B. Crabiel said. "Saving these 232 acres from being developed reduces the strain on schools and roads and other infrastructure that would have been felt had the homes been built."

The freeholders will spend $13 million from its open space fund to purchase the land, and East Brunswick Township will pitch in $500,000. The agreement provides for East Brunswick to receive a conservation easement on a portion of the land.

Closing on the transaction is expected in August.

"We are thrilled that the county is saving these acres from development and preserving them," Mayor William Neary said. "I thank the freeholders for their support and their commitment to protecting open lands. We could not have taken on this purchase alone."

Matzel & Mumford went through a contentious process to gain approval for the development, starting with Planning Board hearings in 2002 and 2003. The township board voted 7-2 against the development in May 2003, but a Superior Court judge later ruled that the construction be allowed if certain environmental conditions were met.